Is it finally time to ditch the photo-sharing site
Flickr? I ask myself this question each December when the time comes to renew my annual $24.95 Pro subscription. I've been a subscribing member for over 6 years now but in recent years it seems to have become increasingly irrelevant. Amongst friends of mine who are users, there has also been a decline in uploads.
So what's stopping me quitting? Answer: the knowledge that should I stop paying my annual subscription I will lose access to all but my most recent 200 photos. The more I think about this the more appalled I feel. Regardless of the fact that when I uploaded my images I was a paying subscriber, Flickr will, as photographer Thomas Hawk says,
hold the rest of your photos hostage on their site until you renew. Moreover, Flickr makes the process of quitting and moving your photos elsewhere - or even batch downloading them - difficult. Tools are available, though they potentially involve a cost.
I joined Flickr in December 2005 to use it as a repository for the increasing number of digital photos I was taking. It also seemed like a good way of showing them off. I soon discovered friends of mine were using the service and I like to think that I introduced a few others along the way too. Comments began to come in from fellow users across the globe and this spurred me on. On the odd occasion I received feedback that helped me improve (for example, keeping the horizon straight). I was a bit more diligent with my tagging back then and I'd add photos to various Groups. But as I began uploading more and more the process of going through each image, giving it a title, description and tags, adding it to a Set and then to a map and then to a Group became a laborious process that I didn't relish. Nowadays I upload photos to Flickr as somewhere to keep them backed up but each year, when renewal time comes around, I think I really should find a way of downloading them all from the site and leaving it to gather dust on the web.
Yahoo! has owned Flickr for a good few years now but, as Thomas Hawk has repeatedly pointed out, you could ask yourself whether they really understand what they've had their hands on for all this time. There has been little in the way of innovation to the point that Flickr looks as though it
is still stuck in 2004, or worse,
dead. This has allowed competitors such as Google, to steal a march and tempt users over to its Google+ service where you can host photos for free. There seems to be a huge contingent of serious photographers
making the switch right now. Anybody that's left seems to be using Facebook.
Over the next few months I'll investigate various alternatives and I'll be sure to blog about the process here.
Thomas Hawk's Digital Connection
idleformat on Flickr